Day of Reckoning… 2010 FIDE Vote

Fédération Internationale des Échecs  (FIDE)

Chess community,

Today marks the highly-anticipated election for the Presidency of the world body of chess known as FIDE (pronounced fee-day). More than 150 countries (including 56 proxies) will cast their ballots to select the body’s leader for the next four years. During the 2006 Olymipad in Turin, Italy, Bessel Kok lost to the Ilyumzhinov campaign. Four years later, the challenger is the formidable Anatoly Karpov, 12th World Champion.

The campaign has been very competitive and even contentious with allegations being made from both sides. Karpov filed a lawsuit seeking to render the Ilyumzhinov nomination invalid. On Monday, the Court of Arbitration ruled that the nomination of the Ilyumzhinov campaign were acceptable and pointed to the imprecise language in the procedures.

Both campaigns spent an inordinate amount of money and time gathering support and attacking the opponent. Given the reports coming out of Khanty-Mansiysk, one wonders whether the election platforms will make any difference. There seems to be a number of problems with the voting procedures and the complaints are mounting.

FIDE is in a confused state as many federations are divided, some irreparably so. FIDE is a sum of its parts, so this does not bode well. Regardless of who wins, the healing process will be difficult and there will be cynics. Is FIDE really “GENS UNA SUMUS” or one body? Will FIDE continue to be one body after the election? Time will tell.

~ Dr. Daaim Shabazz, The Chess Drum


  1. Dear Daaim.
    At this time we already know that, unfortunally, Kirsan did it again. What a sad day for chess. What a sad day for Africa. What a shame!! I never thought that Africa should make Kirsan win. I am so sorry!!!


  2. Well… Africa as well as other regions voted for Ilymumzhinov. He won by 40 votes. There were about 20-25 African nations who voted. Not all voted for Kirsan. I understand that there were issue of accountability with the proxy votes. We shall see what happens. I believe they will keep the result unless they can find where the result would have been different.

  3. Not all, but most did.

    I agree with Pinto. It’s a shame. I guess in order to show ‘appreciation’ Kirsan, Yazici and Co will throw lots of ‘technical support’ into Africa. Strangely, this may turn out to be good for Africa.

  4. Not sure Mehul. These promises were made in 2006, but of course Karpov was a formidable presence when coupled with Kasparov. I am hoping African federations did not elect him on a platform of promises that should have been taking place anyway.

    I believe Asia unanimously voted for Ilyumzhinov. Many mention Africa, but never mention Asia’s influence which is huge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button