World Candidates 2013-12: Carlsen shocked!

Round #12
Friday, 29 March 2013

Preview: Time is getting short. Three rounds left and one point separates the top three position. In a crucial battle today, Levon Aronian will face Vladimir Kramnik in a battle that may determine whether it is a two-horse race instead of a three-horse race. With Magnus Carlsen facing an out-of-form Vassily Ivanchuk, both of them must think about winning if Ivanchuk suffers another meltdown of time pressure. The pressure is on!

Magnus Carlsen was hoping to establish distance from the field against an erratic Vassily Ivanchuk. Photo by Ray Morris-Hill.

2013 World Championship Candidates
March 15th-April 4th, 2013 (London, England)
Round #12
#
Name
Flag
Rating
Result
Name
Flag
Rating
12.1 Carlsen
2872
0-1
Ivanchuk
2757
12.2 Gelfand
2740
½-½
Svidler
2747
12.3 Aronian
2809
0-1
Kramnik
2810
12.4 Radjabov
2793
½-½
Grischuk
2764

Overview: Amazing!!! An absolutely tense round unfolded today in London as the Candidates tournament took a dramatic turn. At one point the commentators did not know what to make out of the wild affair seen in Aronian-Kramnik. The game was a Tarrasch and the pace quickened before move 20. The game was so unclear that both players thought they were better! Take a look.

The move 17.Rc5 started the hostilities after 17…Qd6 18.Qc2!? fxe3. The piece sacrificed turned the board into an inferno as speculation buzzed on servers and amongst the commentators. There were a couple of occasions where Aronian could have played Rh5 but resisted the temptation.

Vladimir Kramnik has finally chased Carlsen and Aronian down. Photo by Ray Morris-Hill.

Aronian’s 21.e4? left spectators gawking since 21…Qf4! appeared to be decisive, but Kramnik played 21…Rac8 and followed the forced line of 22. e5 Bxe5 23. Nxe5 Rxc5 24. Ng6+ Nxg6 25. dxc5. The Russian then uncorked the stunner 25…Be4! netting a piece.

Just when the verdict was deemed final Aronian found the resourceful 33.Rc3!! setting up a drawing position. Verdict? Not! The game sauntered on with white eating the queenside pawns, but then played a clunker in 50.g6?? (50.h6! draws). It was a devastating loss for Aronian and virtually knocks him from contention. Nevertheless he is a party to a game for the ages. What a battle!

In Carlsen-Ivanchuk, a Taimanov Sicilian where black got everything he wanted in a common structure. The key moment occurred after 18.bxc3 and 18…a5 which was criticized by an agitated Carlsen. He stated that he was playing for a win, but it appeared that he had a number of problems. These became real when Ivanchuk broke with 24…g5! and gained activity.

The game still had a number of tricks, but it turns out the Carlsen missed the crucial one… 71.Ke4! His chances begin to melt away rapidly. There were still some stalemating tricks, but this was not the f- and h-pawn rook ending which are commonly drawn (see Radjabov-Grischuk this round), but the e- and h-pawn. Ivanchuk did not suffer a time meltdown and converted smoothly.

Magnus Carlsen’s shocking loss threatens to overturn the predictions of many.
Photo by Ray Morris-Hill.

Carlsen’s loss turned into name-calling and shouts of conspiracy on some websites. Many made excuses for the Carlsen debacle and some even analyzed scenarios where he could still win. There seems to be an implied support for Carlsen to win the tournament. However, it was simply a bad loss in a game where the world’s highest rated player was outplayed in critical stages of the game.

While Carlsen’s composure during the press conference was better than after the draw against Radjabov, he was visibly upset. He referred to his moves as “stupid” but more revealing was his statement that his play was “absolutely disgraceful from move one”. This can be interpreted as entering the game in an uncomfortable state of mind. He will need to fix it or he’ll be making this speech again.

Both Boris Gelfand and Peter Svidler may have the tournament record for most quick draws as their Grunfeld dance only lasted 40 moves. Conversely, Radjabov-Grischuk was a tough battle lasting 87 moves. The Azeri player may have been winning at some point, but ended up in the aforementioned drawn ending f+h rook ending. The game was rather complicated in the middlegame, but when the rook ending emerged, there was some precedence since Grischuk had the stronger side of this ending recently…twice. He drew it rather effortlessly.

Video by Daniel King.

Official Site: https://london2013.fide.com/
Photos by Ray Morris-Hill: https://raymorris-hill.smugmug.com/
Drum Coverage: https://www.thechessdrum.net/blog/2013/03/15/2013-world-championship-candidates-london/

Standings

Vladimir Kramnik, 8/12 (+4 -0 =8), Magnus Carlsen, 7.5/12 (+4 -1 =7), Levon Aronian, 6.5/12 (+4 -3 =5), Peter Svidler, 6/12 (+2 -2 =8), Boris Gelfand 5.5/12 (+2 -3 =7), Alexander Grischuk, 5.5/12 (+1 -2 =9), Vassily Ivanchuk, 5/12 (+2 -4 =6), Teimour Radjabov, 4/12 (+1 -5 =6)

Daaim Shabazz

Daaim Shabazz is the founder of The Chess Drum, while serving as a tenured faculty member of Global Business & Marketing at Florida A&M University in Tallahassee, Florida, USA. He holds a B.S. Computer Science from Chicago State University, an MBA in Marketing and a Ph.D. in International Affairs & Development, both from Clark Atlanta University. He has served the journalist community for more than 30 years and still competes in tournaments occasionally.

11 Comments

  1. On the surface, Magnus appears to be calm. But, during press conference he allows us to see what’s actually unraveling from within. By saying “ Absolutely disgraceful from move one” it exposes that he had some mental worries even before the game got started. Is this inescapable, who knows? But, with two rounds to go, he will have to find a way to play with less psychological worries and hope that Kramnik slip-up.

  2. Guy,

    He looks flustered and his last few games have not been good ones. If he has these emotional meltdowns, he would have serious problems holding it together in a match. Even though he has better matchups, he had better regain control or he’ll be suffering from another zero by his name. There is quite a bit of pressure on him after all the attention given to him by the British press and everyone heaping praise onto him.

  3. Figuratively that’s true. All of the players except Carlsen are from former Soviet Republics, but the notion that they are in collusion to stop him seems a bit dubious. There is nothing strange about the games. They appear hard fought. We should remember that Radjabov offered Carlsen a draw after outplaying him, so that would make such a plot unlikely.

  4. Daaim,

    I think Carlsen has to be the one that help discharge the dreamlike expectation that’s been put on him. When he has a bad day, he should simply say something like, I did not play well today. Modesty will definitely help reduce some of the burden that’s on his shoulder.
    I like him very much and hope that he can use the pressure to his advantage in these last two do or die rounds.

  5. Certainly humility and diplomacy will go a long way on his climb to the top. However, Fischer and Kasparov seem to thrive in their ability to unnerve people with their idiosyncrasies. I believe Carlsen has been overexposed and it appears that he is being hoisted into a position where he has to handle pressure of being #1 along with high expectations of winning the world title.

  6. A gigantic win for Carlsen today! His staying power was more remarkable than his actual play. If he wins the tournament, I believe he will go on to be the next World Champion. He is very determined!

  7. Hello Daaim, Guy. I had looked at some of Carlsen’s games against the Taimanov and they were not great. Perhaps this is what he means by “Absolutely disgraceful from move one”. As to the collusion theories, that must be put to rest by Gelfand today who drew what I thought to be a lost game. I had gone to the gym thinking Carlsen was out of it and came back to find he won. Tomorrows game against Svidler is key. Svidler is playing well after losing to Carlsen earlier. Will we see a Grunfeld. A Berlin in the Ivanchuk -Kramnik game. I for one will be glued to my screen.

  8. Robert,
    I think the statement sounds more like as if he felt like he had played horribly. He could have decided to play any opening after move one. Sometimes, no matter what opening you chose to play, if you don’t pursue the right plan, the outcome will still be the same. I think Magnus was being excessively hard on himself for playing randomly, but not so much on his opening choice.

  9. Just my thoughts on Carlsen’s statement. I think Carlsen is so confident that he feels that he can take chances/risks and still win. While at time pics have exhibited looks of supreme confidence other pics have captured almost sheer joy of being pushed. The looked after he lost was like a kid who got caught stealing cookies out of the cookie jar. Now that his major aspiration is so near I would expect we see a most brilliant game.
    cpercy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button